Compare Portfolios
vs
1.6°C
Warming Potential
65
Total Footprint
96%
Megatrend Exposure
-5.3%
Net Return YTD
4.3°C
Warming Potential
41
Total Footprint
37%
Megatrend Exposure
-3.3%
Net Return YTD
Globalance Zukunftbeweger Fonds
65
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 0%
- balanced:
- 31%
- positive:
- 69%
Shanghai Composite Index
41
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 62%
- balanced:
- 27%
- positive:
- 11%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Power Systems Inc. | 88 | 1.3% | |
| Equinix, Inc. | 86 | 1.4% | |
| SMA Solar Technology AG | 85 | 1.3% | |
| Azure Power Global Ltd. | 83 | 1.3% | |
| Microsoft Corporation | 82 | 1.4% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 78 | 2.7% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 77 | 0.3% | |
| China United Network Communications Limited Class A | 67 | 0.2% | |
| Sanan Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Class A | 65 | 0.8% | |
| China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A | 65 | 0.3% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zur Rose Group AG | 43 | 1.5% | |
| Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. | 43 | 1.4% | |
| Ain Holdings Inc. | 45 | 1.4% | |
| Peptidream Inc. | 46 | 1.5% | |
| Incyte Corporation | 47 | 1.4% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.2% | |
| Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A | 17 | 0.2% | |
| Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A | 18 | 0.4% | |
| China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. Class A | 18 | 0.3% | |
| Anhui Conch Cement Company Limited Class A | 19 | 0.8% |