Compare Portfolios
vs
3.1°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
66%
Megatrend Exposure
21.5%
Return YTD
3.2°C
Warming Potential
58
Total Footprint
64%
Megatrend Exposure
20.6%
Return YTD
Russell 3000
3.1°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 23%
- moderate:
- 50%
- low:
- 27%
MSCI World
3.2°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 26%
- moderate:
- 46%
- low:
- 28%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rockwell Medical, Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| GTT Communications, Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Digimarc Corporation | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited | 1.3°C | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casio Computer Co., Ltd. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Wartsila Oyj Abp | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Keppel Corporation Limited | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Kintetsu Group Holdings Co., Ltd. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Incorporated | 1.3°C | 0.0% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Companies, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| ONEOK, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| Cleveland-Cliffs Inc | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| Ovintiv Inc | 10.0°C | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| Williams Companies, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| ONEOK, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 10.0°C | 0.0% |