Compare Portfolios
vs
3.1°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
66%
Megatrend Exposure
16.2%
Return YTD
3.1°C
Warming Potential
56
Total Footprint
69%
Megatrend Exposure
13%
Return YTD
Russell 3000
57
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 16%
- balanced:
- 36%
- positive:
- 48%
SMI
56
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 6%
- balanced:
- 62%
- positive:
- 32%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pitney Bowes Inc. | 95 | 0.0% | |
| Crawford & Company Class A | 87 | 0.0% | |
| Equinix, Inc. | 86 | 0.2% | |
| Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 85 | 0.2% | |
| Natera, Inc. | 85 | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lonza Group AG | 89 | 4.1% | |
| Swiss Re AG | 82 | 2.4% | |
| Zurich Insurance Group Ltd | 80 | 5.3% | |
| ABB Ltd. | 80 | 4.6% | |
| SGS SA | 74 | 1.5% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calyxt, Inc. | 10 | 0.0% | |
| Eagle Materials Inc. | 10 | 0.0% | |
| Gold Resource Corporation | 13 | 0.0% | |
| Haynes International, Inc. | 14 | 0.0% | |
| Forterra, Inc. | 14 | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Swatch Group Ltd. Bearer | 32 | 0.8% | |
| Holcim Ltd | 37 | 2.5% | |
| Sika AG | 42 | 3.3% | |
| Roche Holding Ltd | 48 | 17.3% | |
| Givaudan SA | 50 | 2.6% |