Compare Portfolios
vs
3.0°C
Warming Potential
58
Total Footprint
69%
Megatrend Exposure
19.9%
Return YTD
3.3°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
66%
Megatrend Exposure
15.1%
Return YTD
S&P 500
3.0°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 22%
- moderate:
- 51%
- low:
- 27%
SPI
3.3°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 34%
- moderate:
- 48%
- low:
- 18%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.1% | |
| Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.1% | |
| Xylem Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.1% | |
| Edison International | 1.3°C | 0.1% | |
| Enphase Energy, Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.1% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| V-ZUG Holding AG | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Landis+Gyr Group AG | 1.3°C | 0.1% | |
| SoftwareONE Holding Ltd. | 1.3°C | 0.2% | |
| Tecan Group AG | 1.3°C | 0.3% | |
| ams AG | 1.3°C | 0.4% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Companies, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| ONEOK, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| CenterPoint Energy, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| Hess Corporation | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| Marathon Oil Corporation | 9.7°C | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vetropack Holding AG Class A | 8.4°C | 0.1% | |
| EMS-CHEMIE HOLDING AG | 8.3°C | 0.4% | |
| Feintool International Holding AG | 7.4°C | 0.0% | |
| COMET Holding AG | 7.0°C | 0.1% | |
| ORIOR AG | 6.6°C | 0.0% |