Compare Portfolios
vs
2.8°C
Warming Potential
60
Total Footprint
72%
Megatrend Exposure
-1.9%
Net Return YTD
4.3°C
Warming Potential
41
Total Footprint
37%
Megatrend Exposure
-1.9%
Net Return YTD
Nikkei 225
60
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 11%
- balanced:
- 26%
- positive:
- 63%
Shanghai Composite Index
41
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 62%
- balanced:
- 27%
- positive:
- 11%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDDI Corporation | 90 | 2.5% | |
| Fujitsu Limited | 87 | 0.2% | |
| Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. | 86 | 0.2% | |
| Z Holdings Corporation | 85 | 0.0% | |
| Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | 81 | 0.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 78 | 2.7% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 77 | 0.3% | |
| China United Network Communications Limited Class A | 67 | 0.2% | |
| Sanan Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Class A | 65 | 0.8% | |
| China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A | 65 | 0.3% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokuyama Corporation | 24 | 0.1% | |
| Japan Tobacco Inc. | 25 | 0.3% | |
| Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. | 27 | 0.0% | |
| Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | 31 | 0.1% | |
| Bridgestone Corporation | 31 | 0.6% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.2% | |
| Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A | 17 | 0.2% | |
| Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A | 18 | 0.4% | |
| China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. Class A | 18 | 0.3% | |
| Anhui Conch Cement Company Limited Class A | 19 | 0.8% |