Compare Portfolios
vs
2.8°C
Warming Potential
60
Total Footprint
72%
Megatrend Exposure
-6.2%
Net Return YTD
3.3°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
66%
Megatrend Exposure
-10.5%
Net Return YTD
Nikkei 225
60
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 11%
- balanced:
- 26%
- positive:
- 63%
SPI
57
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 7%
- balanced:
- 60%
- positive:
- 33%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| KDDI Corporation | 90 | 2.5% | |
| Fujitsu Limited | 87 | 0.2% | |
| Dai Nippon Printing Co., Ltd. | 86 | 0.2% | |
| Z Holdings Corporation | 85 | 0.0% | |
| Fuji Electric Co., Ltd. | 81 | 0.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lonza Group AG | 85 | 3.0% | |
| Swiss Re AG | 84 | 1.5% | |
| Ypsomed Holding AG | 81 | 0.0% | |
| Tecan Group AG | 80 | 0.4% | |
| ABB Ltd. | 80 | 2.9% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokuyama Corporation | 24 | 0.1% | |
| Japan Tobacco Inc. | 25 | 0.3% | |
| Sumitomo Osaka Cement Co., Ltd. | 27 | 0.0% | |
| Yokohama Rubber Co., Ltd. | 31 | 0.1% | |
| Bridgestone Corporation | 31 | 0.6% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TX Group AG | 22 | 0.0% | |
| EMS-CHEMIE HOLDING AG | 24 | 0.4% | |
| Autoneum Holding AG | 29 | 0.0% | |
| ALSO Holding AG | 29 | 0.1% | |
| Swiss Steel Holding AG | 29 | 0.0% |