Compare Portfolios

vs

4.3°C

Warming Potential

41

Total Footprint

37%

Megatrend Exposure

-15.2%

Net Return YTD

3.6°C

Warming Potential

60

Total Footprint

60%

Megatrend Exposure

-11.8%

Net Return YTD

Shanghai Composite Index

41

Total Footprint

Portfolio Footprint Score

Data source: Globalance

60

Total Footprint

Portfolio Footprint Score

Data source: Globalance

These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios

Shanghai Composite Index

Asset Name	Total Footprint	% of portfolio
LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A	78	2.7%
Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A	77	0.3%
China United Network Communications Limited Class A	67	0.2%
Sanan Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Class A	65	0.8%
China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A	65	0.3%

Hang Seng Index

Asset Name	Total Footprint	% of portfolio
Wuxi Biologics (Cayman) Inc.	86	3.7%
Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd.	86	0.6%
China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited	83	0.2%
Tencent Holdings Ltd.	79	7.6%
Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd.	78	4.3%

These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios

Shanghai Composite Index

Asset Name	Total Footprint	% of portfolio
Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A	9	0.2%
Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A	17	0.2%
Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A	18	0.4%
China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. Class A	18	0.3%
Anhui Conch Cement Company Limited Class A	19	0.8%

Hang Seng Index

Asset Name	Total Footprint	% of portfolio
CNOOC Limited	27	1.2%
Hengan International Group Co., Ltd.	31	0.3%
Shenzhou International Group Holdings Limited	34	1.2%
ANTA Sports Products Ltd.	34	1.5%
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd	35	1.2%