Compare Portfolios
vs
4.0°C
Warming Potential
41
Total Footprint
40%
Megatrend Exposure
3.9%
Return YTD
3.5°C
Warming Potential
58
Total Footprint
58%
Megatrend Exposure
-4%
Return YTD
Shanghai Composite Index
41
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 57%
- balanced:
- 33%
- positive:
- 10%
Hang Seng Index
58
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 24%
- balanced:
- 20%
- positive:
- 56%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 78 | 1.0% | |
| China United Network Communications Limited Class A | 76 | 0.3% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 75 | 0.3% | |
| JCET Group Co., Ltd. Class A | 69 | 0.4% | |
| China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A | 65 | 0.4% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wuxi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. | 85 | 3.1% | |
| China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited | 83 | 0.2% | |
| Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. | 78 | 5.2% | |
| China Mobile Limited | 76 | 2.5% | |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd. | 73 | 11.0% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.2% | |
| Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A | 13 | 0.2% | |
| Wanhua Chemical Group Co. Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.8% | |
| Huaneng Power International, Inc. Class A | 17 | 0.2% | |
| Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A | 17 | 0.6% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNOOC Limited | 27 | 1.2% | |
| CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd | 30 | 1.3% | |
| Hengan International Group Co., Ltd. | 31 | 0.3% | |
| Meituan Class B | 31 | 5.7% | |
| CITIC Limited | 35 | 0.4% |