Compare Portfolios
vs
4.3°C
Warming Potential
42
Total Footprint
39%
Megatrend Exposure
4.6%
Net Return YTD
2.0°C
Warming Potential
66
Total Footprint
88%
Megatrend Exposure
26.5%
Net Return YTD
Shanghai Composite Index
42
Total Footprint
Loading…
Data source: Globalance
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 59%
- balanced:
- 24%
- positive:
- 17%
Nasdaq Composite
66
Total Footprint
Loading…
Data source: Globalance
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 3%
- balanced:
- 17%
- positive:
- 80%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd. Class A | 93 | 0.7% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 75 | 0.3% | |
| Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co. Ltd. Class A | 73 | 0.2% | |
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Class A | 73 | 0.8% | |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. Class A | 72 | 1.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automatic Data Processing, Inc. | 92 | 0.7% | |
| Paychex, Inc. | 88 | 0.3% | |
| Illumina, Inc. | 87 | 0.3% | |
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. | 86 | 0.5% | |
| Intel Corporation | 83 | 1.0% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.3% | |
| Hoshine Silicon Industry Co. Ltd. Class A | 10 | 0.4% | |
| GD Power Development Co., Ltd Class A | 14 | 0.3% | |
| Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.4% | |
| Ningbo Shanshan Co., Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constellation Energy Corporation | 29 | 0.2% | |
| O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. | 33 | 0.4% | |
| Monster Beverage Corporation | 34 | 0.4% | |
| Diamondback Energy, Inc. | 34 | 0.2% | |
| PACCAR Inc | 36 | 0.3% |