Compare Portfolios
vs
4.3°C
Warming Potential
42
Total Footprint
39%
Megatrend Exposure
3.7%
Net Return YTD
2.5°C
Warming Potential
54
Total Footprint
43%
Megatrend Exposure
0.5%
Net Return YTD
Shanghai Composite Index
42
Total Footprint
Loading…
Data source: Globalance
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 59%
- balanced:
- 24%
- positive:
- 17%
FTSE 100
54
Total Footprint
Loading…
Data source: Globalance
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 19%
- balanced:
- 48%
- positive:
- 33%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| WuXi AppTec Co., Ltd. Class A | 93 | 0.7% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 75 | 0.3% | |
| Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holding Co. Ltd. Class A | 73 | 0.2% | |
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Class A | 73 | 0.8% | |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. Class A | 72 | 1.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Auto Trader Group PLC | 91 | 0.3% | |
| Rightmove plc | 90 | 0.2% | |
| BT Group plc | 88 | 0.5% | |
| Aviva plc | 88 | 0.6% | |
| London Stock Exchange Group plc | 86 | 1.5% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.3% | |
| Hoshine Silicon Industry Co. Ltd. Class A | 10 | 0.4% | |
| GD Power Development Co., Ltd Class A | 14 | 0.3% | |
| Kingfa Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.4% | |
| Ningbo Shanshan Co., Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| British American Tobacco p.l.c. | 16 | 3.2% | |
| Imperial Brands PLC | 17 | 0.9% | |
| Haleon PLC | 20 | 0.9% | |
| Evraz PLC | 26 | 0.0% | |
| International Consolidated Airlines Group SA | 29 | 0.3% |