Compare Portfolios
vs
4.0°C
Warming Potential
41
Total Footprint
40%
Megatrend Exposure
3.9%
Return YTD
1.4°C
Warming Potential
66
Total Footprint
97%
Megatrend Exposure
3.8%
Return YTD
Shanghai Composite Index
41
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 57%
- balanced:
- 33%
- positive:
- 10%
Bertrand Piccard
66
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 0%
- balanced:
- 30%
- positive:
- 70%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 78 | 1.0% | |
| China United Network Communications Limited Class A | 76 | 0.3% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 75 | 0.3% | |
| JCET Group Co., Ltd. Class A | 69 | 0.4% | |
| China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A | 65 | 0.4% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Power Systems Inc. | 84 | 4.6% | |
| Azure Power Global Ltd. | 83 | 4.3% | |
| SMA Solar Technology AG | 81 | 4.2% | |
| Sunrun Inc. | 74 | 5.0% | |
| Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, S.A. | 74 | 4.8% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.2% | |
| Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A | 13 | 0.2% | |
| Wanhua Chemical Group Co. Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.8% | |
| Huaneng Power International, Inc. Class A | 17 | 0.2% | |
| Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A | 17 | 0.6% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TripAdvisor, Inc. | 51 | 4.5% | |
| Umicore | 52 | 3.9% | |
| CANCOM SE | 54 | 4.8% | |
| Clean Harbors, Inc. | 55 | 5.3% | |
| Humana Inc. | 55 | 5.2% |