Compare Portfolios
vs
4.3°C
Warming Potential
41
Total Footprint
37%
Megatrend Exposure
-15.2%
Net Return YTD
4.0°C
Warming Potential
58
Total Footprint
57%
Megatrend Exposure
-11.8%
Net Return YTD
Shanghai Composite Index
41
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 62%
- balanced:
- 27%
- positive:
- 11%
DAX
58
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 31%
- balanced:
- 17%
- positive:
- 52%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 78 | 2.7% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 77 | 0.3% | |
| China United Network Communications Limited Class A | 67 | 0.2% | |
| Sanan Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. Class A | 65 | 0.8% | |
| China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A | 65 | 0.3% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE | 88 | 8.3% | |
| Allianz SE | 87 | 7.0% | |
| Deutsche Boerse AG | 86 | 2.4% | |
| Munich Reinsurance Company | 85 | 2.7% | |
| Infineon Technologies AG | 79 | 3.0% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.2% | |
| Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A | 17 | 0.2% | |
| Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A | 18 | 0.4% | |
| China Northern Rare Earth (Group) High-Tech Co., Ltd. Class A | 18 | 0.3% | |
| Anhui Conch Cement Company Limited Class A | 19 | 0.8% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTU Aero Engines AG | 28 | 0.8% | |
| Airbus SE | 31 | 4.8% | |
| HelloFresh SE | 34 | 0.6% | |
| Covestro AG | 36 | 0.7% | |
| BASF SE | 37 | 3.7% |