Compare Portfolios
vs
4.0°C
Warming Potential
41
Total Footprint
40%
Megatrend Exposure
3.2%
Return YTD
4.0°C
Warming Potential
58
Total Footprint
59%
Megatrend Exposure
13.3%
Return YTD
Shanghai Composite Index
41
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 57%
- balanced:
- 33%
- positive:
- 10%
DAX
58
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 30%
- balanced:
- 15%
- positive:
- 55%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 78 | 1.0% | |
| China United Network Communications Limited Class A | 76 | 0.3% | |
| Zhejiang Chint Electrics Co., Ltd Class A | 75 | 0.3% | |
| JCET Group Co., Ltd. Class A | 69 | 0.4% | |
| China Railway Construction Corporation Limited Class A | 65 | 0.4% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE | 88 | 9.2% | |
| Deutsche Boerse AG | 87 | 1.9% | |
| Allianz SE | 86 | 5.6% | |
| Munich Reinsurance Company | 85 | 2.4% | |
| Infineon Technologies AG | 78 | 3.4% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inner Mongolia MengDian HuaNeng Thermal Power Corporation Limited Class A | 9 | 0.2% | |
| Zhongjin Gold Corp., Ltd. Class A | 13 | 0.2% | |
| Wanhua Chemical Group Co. Ltd. Class A | 16 | 0.8% | |
| Huaneng Power International, Inc. Class A | 17 | 0.2% | |
| Shandong Gold Mining Co., Ltd. Class A | 17 | 0.6% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTU Aero Engines AG | 27 | 0.7% | |
| Delivery Hero SE | 30 | 1.6% | |
| Airbus SE | 35 | 4.8% | |
| Covestro AG | 36 | 0.8% | |
| BASF SE | 38 | 4.2% |