Compare Portfolios
vs
3.2°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
68%
Megatrend Exposure
17.4%
Return YTD
3.3°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
66%
Megatrend Exposure
17.3%
Return YTD
SMI
57
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 6%
- balanced:
- 62%
- positive:
- 32%
SPI
57
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 7%
- balanced:
- 60%
- positive:
- 33%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lonza Group AG | 85 | 4.2% | |
| Swiss Re AG | 84 | 2.1% | |
| Zurich Insurance Group Ltd | 80 | 4.9% | |
| ABB Ltd. | 80 | 4.0% | |
| Swiss Life Holding AG | 78 | 1.3% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lonza Group AG | 85 | 3.0% | |
| Swiss Re AG | 84 | 1.5% | |
| Ypsomed Holding AG | 81 | 0.0% | |
| Zurich Insurance Group Ltd | 80 | 3.5% | |
| Tecan Group AG | 80 | 0.4% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Holcim Ltd | 33 | 2.1% | |
| Sika AG | 42 | 3.6% | |
| Logitech International S.A. | 47 | 1.0% | |
| Roche Holding Ltd | 48 | 18.6% | |
| Novartis AG | 50 | 14.6% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TX Group AG | 19 | 0.0% | |
| EMS-CHEMIE HOLDING AG | 26 | 0.4% | |
| Autoneum Holding AG | 29 | 0.0% | |
| ALSO Holding AG | 29 | 0.1% | |
| Swiss Steel Holding AG | 29 | 0.0% |