Compare Portfolios
vs
1.7°C
Warming Potential
66
Total Footprint
92%
Megatrend Exposure
4.3%
Return YTD
3.8°C
Warming Potential
55
Total Footprint
54%
Megatrend Exposure
4.6%
Return YTD
Bertrand Piccard
1.7°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 0%
- moderate:
- 24%
- low:
- 76%
Hang Seng Index
3.8°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 43%
- moderate:
- 38%
- low:
- 19%
Top 5 Companies
These are the companies with the lowest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecolab Inc. | 1.3°C | 5.8% | |
| Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, S.A. | 1.3°C | 5.3% | |
| East Japan Railway Company | 1.3°C | 5.4% | |
| Azure Power Global Ltd. | 1.3°C | 5.4% | |
| ServiceNow, Inc. | 1.3°C | 6.0% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.3% | |
| MTR Corporation Limited | 1.3°C | 0.6% | |
| AIA Group Limited | 1.5°C | 9.9% | |
| China Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Class H | 1.5°C | 1.1% | |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. Class H | 1.7°C | 4.7% |
Bottom 5 Companies
These are the companies with the highest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| China Everbright Environment Group Limited | 3.4°C | 5.4% | |
| Best Buy Co., Inc. | 2.8°C | 5.5% | |
| SoftBank Group Corp. | 2.2°C | 7.3% | |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. | 2.1°C | 5.4% | |
| CANCOM SE | 1.7°C | 4.6% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geely Automobile Holdings Limited | 9.3°C | 1.5% | |
| Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Class H | 8.3°C | 3.2% | |
| CLP Holdings Limited | 8.1°C | 1.3% | |
| PetroChina Company Limited Class H | 8.1°C | 0.4% | |
| CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd | 7.6°C | 1.3% |