Compare Portfolios
vs
1.4°C
Warming Potential
66
Total Footprint
98%
Megatrend Exposure
-6.7%
Net Return YTD
3.3°C
Warming Potential
57
Total Footprint
66%
Megatrend Exposure
-3.4%
Net Return YTD
Bertrand Piccard
66
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 0%
- balanced:
- 24%
- positive:
- 76%
SPI
57
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 7%
- balanced:
- 60%
- positive:
- 33%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Power Systems Inc. | 88 | 3.6% | |
| SMA Solar Technology AG | 85 | 3.7% | |
| Azure Power Global Ltd. | 83 | 3.4% | |
| Sunrun Inc. | 74 | 3.5% | |
| Solaria Energia y Medio Ambiente, S.A. | 74 | 5.1% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lonza Group AG | 85 | 3.0% | |
| Swiss Re AG | 84 | 1.5% | |
| Ypsomed Holding AG | 81 | 0.0% | |
| Tecan Group AG | 80 | 0.4% | |
| ABB Ltd. | 80 | 2.9% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BYD Company Limited Class H | 52 | 6.2% | |
| TripAdvisor, Inc. | 53 | 4.4% | |
| Umicore | 54 | 3.0% | |
| Clean Harbors, Inc. | 55 | 5.2% | |
| Humana Inc. | 55 | 5.0% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TX Group AG | 22 | 0.0% | |
| EMS-CHEMIE HOLDING AG | 24 | 0.4% | |
| Autoneum Holding AG | 29 | 0.0% | |
| ALSO Holding AG | 29 | 0.1% | |
| Swiss Steel Holding AG | 29 | 0.0% |