Compare Portfolios
vs
3.3°C
Warming Potential
56
Total Footprint
62%
Megatrend Exposure
10%
Return YTD
3.8°C
Warming Potential
55
Total Footprint
54%
Megatrend Exposure
4.6%
Return YTD
MSCI World
3.3°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 29%
- moderate:
- 45%
- low:
- 26%
Hang Seng Index
3.8°C
Warming Potential
Portfolio Warming Potential
Data source: Globalance and MSCI ESG
- high:
- 43%
- moderate:
- 38%
- low:
- 19%
Top 5 Companies
These are the companies with the lowest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Casio Computer Co., Ltd. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Wartsila Oyj Abp | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Keppel Corporation Limited | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Kintetsu Group Holdings Co., Ltd. | 1.3°C | 0.0% | |
| Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings, Incorporated | 1.3°C | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAC Technologies Holdings Inc. | 1.3°C | 0.3% | |
| MTR Corporation Limited | 1.3°C | 0.6% | |
| AIA Group Limited | 1.5°C | 9.9% | |
| China Life Insurance Co. Ltd. Class H | 1.5°C | 1.1% | |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd. Class H | 1.7°C | 4.7% |
Bottom 5 Companies
These are the companies with the highest climate score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Canadian Natural Resources Limited | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| Williams Companies, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.1% | |
| ONEOK, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| Cheniere Energy, Inc. | 10.0°C | 0.0% | |
| First Quantum Minerals Ltd. | 10.0°C | 0.0% |
Asset Name | Warming Potential | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Geely Automobile Holdings Limited | 9.3°C | 1.5% | |
| Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited Class H | 8.3°C | 3.2% | |
| CLP Holdings Limited | 8.1°C | 1.3% | |
| PetroChina Company Limited Class H | 8.1°C | 0.4% | |
| CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd | 7.6°C | 1.3% |