Compare Portfolios
vs
4.0°C
Warming Potential
58
Total Footprint
59%
Megatrend Exposure
-0%
Net Return YTD
3.6°C
Warming Potential
60
Total Footprint
60%
Megatrend Exposure
4.2%
Net Return YTD
DAX
58
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 31%
- balanced:
- 18%
- positive:
- 51%
Hang Seng Index
60
Total Footprint
Portfolio Footprint Score
Data source: Globalance
- adverse:
- 13%
- balanced:
- 35%
- positive:
- 52%
Top 5 Assets
These are the assets with the highest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAP SE | 88 | 9.3% | |
| Allianz SE | 87 | 5.9% | |
| Deutsche Boerse AG | 86 | 1.9% | |
| Munich Reinsurance Company | 85 | 2.5% | |
| Infineon Technologies AG | 79 | 3.7% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wuxi Biologics (Cayman) Inc. | 86 | 3.7% | |
| Xinyi Solar Holdings Ltd. | 86 | 0.6% | |
| China Unicom (Hong Kong) Limited | 83 | 0.2% | |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd. | 79 | 7.6% | |
| Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd. | 78 | 4.3% |
Bottom 5 Assets
These are the assets with the lowest footprint score in each of the two portfolios
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MTU Aero Engines AG | 28 | 0.8% | |
| Airbus SE | 31 | 4.7% | |
| HelloFresh SE | 34 | 1.0% | |
| Covestro AG | 36 | 0.7% | |
| BASF SE | 37 | 4.0% |
Asset Name | Total Footprint | % of portfolio | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNOOC Limited | 27 | 1.2% | |
| Hengan International Group Co., Ltd. | 31 | 0.3% | |
| Shenzhou International Group Holdings Limited | 34 | 1.2% | |
| ANTA Sports Products Ltd. | 34 | 1.5% | |
| CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd | 35 | 1.2% |